🎙️ Voice is AI-generated. Inconsistencies may occur.
The war in Ukraine has become a frequent target for commentators who believe that U.S. spending toward the conflict ought to be curbed and reinvested domestically.
The two frontrunners in early polls for the 2024 Republican presidential contenders, former President Donald Trump and Florida Governor Ron DeSantis—who hasn't declared yet but is expected to run—have both said they don't see Ukraine as a vital national strategic interest for the U.S.
Amid this criticism, a figure of $200 billion has been repeatedly quoted as the U.S. total spending toward the country, reportedly its entire GDP.

The Claim
A tweet by former Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs for the U.S. Department of the Treasury Monica Crowley, posted on April 18, 2023, viewed 32,000 times, stated: "$200 billion+ of your hard-earned money has been disappeared into the corrupt money-pit of Ukraine.
"Happy Tax Day!"
The Facts
This figure has been repeated by a number of right-leaning politicians and public figures in the past two months including Representative Andy Biggs (R-AZ), former Trump advisor Steve Bannon, and former Republican candidate for Arizona governor Kari Lake.
A February 12, 2023, article by Fox News was among its first appearances, with the authors noting two sources: the presidential office of Ukraine and the Ukraine Support Tracker (produced by economic research organization the Kiel Institute for the World Economy).
However, the Kiel Institute states U.S. spending on all categories of aid has reached around $77 billion, not $200 billion, enacted across four bills since February 2022.
In total, Congress has allocated $113 billion in a combination of mostly military, government, and humanitarian aid to Ukraine since last year, according to the Department of Defense Office of Inspector General.
But, Kiel notes that a "large portion" of this $113 billion "will not flow directly to Ukraine but is instead allocated towards a broad variety of spending purposes."
A working document for the tracker states: "Examples include spending for preemptive natural disaster funds, research on military or nuclear purposes, the prevention of terrorism and cybercrime, national infrastructure investments, large-scale purchases of military goods intended to remain in the US...or funds devoted to host Ukrainian refugees in the US."
In its calculation, Kiel does not include $17 billion earmarked for European command operations, $5 billion for neighboring countries but not Ukraine, and nearly $12 billion in commitments that were unused and therefore expired. Its exclusions result in a revised direct spend of around $77 billion.
Whether Kiel should have deducted that amount may be debatable, but its calculation (or one near the same amount) has been repeated by research organizations including Statista, the Council on Foreign Relations, and the Carnegie Corporation of New York.
This strongly suggests that the U.S. has not spent anywhere close to $200 billion. Furthermore, Newsweek has so far been unable to find any statement from the presidential office of Ukraine which supports that higher number—the office has been contacted via email for comment.
André Frank, Project Lead for the Ukraine Support Tracker, told Newsweek that the $200 billion claim was "wrong" and suspected it may have been a misinterpretation of the tracker's data, perhaps by using information from a since-updated database.
Of course, there is a possibility that Crowley's claim may refer to aid provided both before and after the Russian invasion in February 2022. However, the sums committed before February 2022 pale in comparison.
For example, according to the Congressional Research Service, Biden has used Presidential Drawdown Authority to authorize the immediate transfer of articles and services from U.S. stocks (up to a funding cap) to Ukraine valued at $19.2 billion since August 2021. However, of that, only $610 million of that value was authorized between August 2021 and the start of the invasion.
Analysis by Axios in January 2022, based on data from ForeignAssistance.gov, indicated that total U.S. military support since the Russian invasion of Crimea in 2014 amounted to $2.7 billion.
A similar sum was calculated by Kiel, which said the government provided "more than $2.5 billion in security assistance to Ukraine between 2014 and 2021, mainly through the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative and Foreign Military Financing."
Kiel added that the U.S. Department of State and USAID also provided "more than $3 billion in bilateral, non-military aid since 2014."
This would mean that even if we included funding before the war, on top of the full $113 billion Congressionally approved allocations for Ukraine, the figure still wouldn't reach even close to $200 billion.
Nonetheless, the claim was repeated later in February this year, although neither the statement from the presidential office of Ukraine nor Kiel's tracker was quoted.
On Tucker Carlson Tonight, in February 2023, Carlson alleged that $123 billion had been committed by Congress so far and that "when you add a thousand other off-the-book sources of aid, the entire intel world, you're looking at perhaps $200 billion to Zelensky and his wife in 12 months."
For a start, the implication that the said money (much of which was in fact the estimated monetary worth of outdated military equipment and weapons the U.S. was already planning to discard) went to Zelensky or his family, rather than Ukraine's military or financial authorities, are not based in fact.
As Newsweek has previously reported, they fail to acknowledge the auditing and scrutiny that U.S. foreign aid receives to ensure that it is spent appropriately on measures relating to Ukrainian assistance.
Furthermore, $10 billion in the now-former Fox News hosts' $123 billion calculation was based on spending plans that Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen announced to the G20 earlier this year.
The U.S. Treasury told Newsweek that the $10 billion was part of the approved Congressional spending, not a new sum to be added to an existing figure.
As for the other "thousand other off-the-book sources of aid", Carlson does not elaborate on whether these are from governmental or private sources of aid. Newsweek contacted a Fox News representative via email for clarification.
Without knowing what those extra "off the book" sources are, we can't conclude that the $200 billion figure (whether it's real or not) comes from U.S. taxpayers either (as Crowley's tweet suggests). Without direct evidence, Carlson's claim versus that of multiple spending researchers does not appear to be credible.
In any case, there is no evidence to support the notion that the U.S. has spent $200 billion, with expert research indicating that total direct spending has not even reached the $100 billion mark, let alone double that number.
A spokesperson for the Executive Office of the (U.S.) President said the $200 billion figure "doesn't seem to be correct", adding "I think $90b would be more accurate."
The Ruling

False
Congress has only approved $113 billion for spending in Ukraine. Researchers tracking spending suggest that only around $77 billion has gone directly to Ukraine, a combination of financial, military and other forms of aid.
It's not clear where the $200 billion figure has come from. A Fox News report in February 2023 attributed it to a Ukrainian government statement that Newsweek could not find. Another estimate broadcast on Tucker Carlson Tonight the same month was presented without evidence and upon inspection appears dubious.
FACT CHECK BY Newsweek's Fact Check team
About the writer
Tom Norton is Newsweek's Fact Check reporter, based in London. His focus is reporting on misinformation and misleading information in ... Read more